1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1960 Bentley S2
To start off, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Bentley S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Bentley S2 would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Bentley S2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1960 Bentley S2 has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III has manual transmission. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1960 Bentley S2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1960 Bentley S2 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Bentley |
Model | 3000 Mk III | S2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 6229 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 81 L |