1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1966 Nissan Cedric is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 110 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (225 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Cedric |
Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2700 mm |