1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1968 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 115 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (225 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1968 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Isuzu |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Bellel |
Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 40 L |