1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1971 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1971 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1971 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1971 Monteverdi 2000 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Monteverdi |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 2000 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 82 L |