1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1973 DAF 66
To start off, 1973 DAF 66 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 340 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (225 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1973 DAF 66 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | DAF |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 66 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 99 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 32 L |