1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1983 Lada 2105
To start off, 1983 Lada 2105 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1983 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1983 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 180 kg more than 1983 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1983 Lada 2105 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Lada |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 2105 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2430 mm |