1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 1983 Renault 9 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 360 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1983 Renault 9 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 9 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 38 L |