1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1990 Peugeot 205
To start off, 1990 Peugeot 205 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1990 Peugeot 205 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Peugeot |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 205 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1390 mm |