1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1996 Citroen Rally Raid
To start off, 1996 Citroen Rally Raid is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen Rally Raid (297 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Rally Raid should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen Rally Raid weights approximately 270 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen Rally Raid (590 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (225 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen Rally Raid will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1996 Citroen Rally Raid | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | Rally Raid |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 225 Nm | 590 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3000 mm |
