1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1996 Renault Fifties
To start off, 1996 Renault Fifties is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Renault Fifties. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Fifties. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Fifties weights approximately 395 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1996 Renault Fifties | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Fifties |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 60 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |