1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1998 Mazda 626
To start off, 1998 Mazda 626 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda 626 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (225 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1998 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 626 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2620 mm |