1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2004 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 215 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III has manual transmission. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2004 Bristol Blenheim | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Bristol |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Blenheim |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 105 L |