1964 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1951 GAZ M-20
To start off, 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite (59 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1951 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite should accelerate faster than 1951 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 746 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 GAZ M-20 (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. (84 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1951 GAZ M-20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1951 GAZ M-20 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | GAZ |
Model | Sprite | M-20 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |