1964 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1953 Steyr 2000
To start off, 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Steyr 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Steyr 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Steyr 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Steyr 2000 (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. (59 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Steyr 2000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Steyr 2000 weights approximately 486 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1953 Steyr 2000 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Steyr |
| Model | Sprite | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |
