1964 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,244 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 96 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sprite | Colt |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2310 mm |