1964 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. (84 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Sprite | Camaro |
Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 84 Nm | 376 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |