1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
| Make | Austin | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Mini Cooper | Silver Dawn |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4255 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 108 L |
