1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 470 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Mini Cooper | Falcon |
Year Released | 1964 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |