1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1961 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. (76 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Dodge Polara weights approximately 875 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 1961 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | Mini Cooper | Polara |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5907 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2960 mm |
