1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1963 NSU 1000 LS

To start off, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper (76 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Mini Cooper weights approximately 30 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 NSU 1000 LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin Mini Cooper 1963 NSU 1000 LS
Make Austin NSU
Model Mini Cooper 1000 LS
Year Released 1964 1963
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1275 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 76 HP 42 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 96 Nm 70 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70.6 mm 69 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.3 mm 66.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 8.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 650 kg 620 kg
Vehicle Length 3060 mm 3790 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 34 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]