1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 890 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Because 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin Mini Cooper has manual transmission. 1964 Austin Mini Cooper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 1979 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Mini Cooper | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2870 mm |