1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Mini Cooper | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2490 mm |