1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. (76 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1694 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. (96 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Mini Cooper | Armada |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 2344 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 106 L |
