1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2005 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Korando is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Korando (139 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. (76 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Korando (307 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 2005 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Austin | SsangYong |
Model | Mini Cooper | Korando |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 307 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 22.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1785 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 72 L |