1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 559 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | Mini Cooper | Polo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 96 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 19.5:1 |
Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1209 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |