1964 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper (76 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Mini Cooper | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Mini Cooper | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 68 HP |
| Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2360 mm |
