1964 Austin Princess vs. 1955 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1964 Austin Princess is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 660 kg more than 1955 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 1955 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1964 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1520 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3000 mm |