1964 Austin Princess vs. 1960 Ferrari 256 F1
To start off, 1964 Austin Princess is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 1620 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | |
Make | Austin | Ferrari |
Model | Princess | 256 F1 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 159 L |