1964 Austin Princess vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1964 Austin Princess is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 38 kg more than 1962 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1964 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | DeVille |
Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 82 L |