1964 Austin Princess vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1964 Austin Princess is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 985 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Princess | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Austin | Triumph |
| Model | Princess | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2700 mm |
