1964 Austin Princess vs. 1972 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1972 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac DeVille (211 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 55 kg more than 1972 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Princess | 1972 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Princess | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3310 mm |
