1964 Austin Princess vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1983 Toyota Celica is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Princess (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Princess | Celica |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2640 mm |