1964 Austin Princess vs. 1991 Ford Aerostar

To start off, 1991 Ford Aerostar is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Aerostar (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 770 kg more than 1991 Ford Aerostar.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Aerostar. (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Aerostar.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin Princess 1991 Ford Aerostar
Make Austin Ford
Model Princess Aerostar
Year Released 1964 1991
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 2979 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 119 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 224 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1410 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 3030 mm