1964 Austin Princess vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 1994 Rover 200 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Princess (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 970 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Austin | Rover |
Model | Princess | 200 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |