1964 Austin Princess vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Princess (119 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Austin | MCC |
Model | Princess | Smart |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |