1964 Austin Princess vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 391 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 530 kg more than 1997 Renault Helem.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Princess | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | Princess | Helem |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |
