1964 Austin Princess vs. 2000 Porsche Boxster
To start off, 2000 Porsche Boxster is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Porsche Boxster (249 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Porsche Boxster (309 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2000 Porsche Boxster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2000 Porsche Boxster | |
Make | Austin | Porsche |
Model | Princess | Boxster |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2855 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 249 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 309 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2420 mm |