1964 Austin Princess vs. 2001 Dodge Ram

To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Ram (235 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 366 kg more than 2001 Dodge Ram.

Because 1964 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2001 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin Princess 2001 Dodge Ram
Make Austin Dodge
Model Princess Ram
Year Released 1964 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 5900 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 119 HP 235 HP
Torque 251 Nm 447 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1814 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 5700 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 3530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 76 L