1964 Austin Princess vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 345 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1964 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Princess | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Princess | MM |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 106 L |
