1964 Austin Princess vs. 2003 Dodge Ram

To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 381 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 94 kg more than 1964 Austin Princess. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin Princess 2003 Dodge Ram
Make Austin Dodge
Model Princess Ram
Year Released 1964 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 8277 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 10 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 119 HP 500 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 732 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 2274 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 5170 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1900 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 3030 mm