1964 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 94 kg more than 1964 Austin Princess. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Princess | Armada |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 106 L |