1964 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 588 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin Princess 2005 Cadillac CTS
Make Austin Cadillac
Model Princess CTS
Year Released 1964 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 119 HP 255 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 343 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1592 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 64 L