1964 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 608 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Princess | Blazer |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1572 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |