1964 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Princess (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 650 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Austin | Kia |
Model | Princess | K2700 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |