1964 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 670 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (217 Nm). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Princess | Outlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 59 L |