1964 Austin Princess vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 280 kg more than 2005 SsangYong Rexton.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Princess | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Austin | SsangYong |
| Model | Princess | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2874 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |
