1964 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 170 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Princess | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 87 L |