1964 Austin Princess vs. 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess. 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1964 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Princess | Outlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 277 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 63 L |