1964 Austin Princess vs. 2008 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Defender is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 63 kg more than 2008 Land Rover Defender.
Because 2008 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Defender (301 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2008 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Austin | Land Rover |
Model | Princess | Defender |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2495 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2117 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 93 L |