1964 Austin Princess vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Princess (119 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1964 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Princess | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |